<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gargleblaster.org &#187; web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gargleblaster.org/tag/web-20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web 3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2007/03/16/web-30.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2007/03/16/web-30.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BOFH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/2007/03/16/web-30.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning before going to work I had a little chat with a friend of mine. me: morning what&#8217;s your opinion about javascript? friend: Necessary evil. me: hmm ok you&#8217;re on the same line as sans http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2457&#038;rss friend: http is too dumb to do what people want to do. And javascript is better than java. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning before going to work I had a little chat with a friend of mine.</p>
<p>me:<br />
morning<br />
what&#8217;s your opinion about javascript?</p>
<div align="right">
friend:<br />
Necessary evil.
</div>
<p>me:<br />
hmm ok you&#8217;re on the same line as sans</p>
<p>http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2457&#038;rss</p>
<div align="right">
friend:<br />
http is too dumb to do what people want to do.<br />
And javascript is better than java.<br />
And it&#8217;s more cross platform.  But it&#8217;s tough to write and easy to hide evil.
</div>
<p>me:<br />
i am &#8220;discovering&#8221; javascript the last months<br />
(i know, 10 years late)<br />
i think it rocks.<br />
makes me totally reconsider the way webpages could work<br />
building a part now where ppl can make teams, by drag and dropping members<br />
without a single page refresh.</p>
<div align="right">
friend:<br />
Right.<br />
Welcome to web 2.0.<br />
Well, we&#8217;re on 3.0<br />
But you can join 2.0
</div>
<p>me:<br />
yh i heard the 3.0 for the first time this week<br />
what&#8217;s 3.0 btw?<br />
no internet? borg?</p>
<div align="right">
friend @ 7:15<br />
It&#8217;s nonsense.<br />
Like 2.0
</div>
<p>me @ 07:15<br />
like 2.0 is<br />
gmta, rofl</p>
<p><b><i>Update</i></b><br />
Another friend pointed me (after reading the above> to this userfriendly cartoon&#8230;</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20061201"><img src = "http://www.gargleblaster.org/images2/userfriendly.gif"/ alt="web2.0" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2007/03/16/web-30.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OOP programming for webapplications usefull?</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/31/oop-programming-for-webapplications-usefull.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/31/oop-programming-for-webapplications-usefull.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While coding (php5) on a new project today, I found myself struggling with the question to fit a collection of functions in a class or not. Or in other words, to maintain a procedural style, or more object orientated. I only learned recently how to use objects and classes in php5 and I find myself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While coding (php5) on a new project today, I found myself struggling with the question to fit a collection of functions in a class or not. Or in other words, to maintain a procedural style, or more object orientated.<br />
I only learned recently how to use objects and classes in php5 and I find myself mixing objects and procedural style within scripts. For instance, html templates and database abstraction is fitted in classes, while handling a form (collection -> validating ->processing) is done in a procedural style in my scripts.</p>
<p>I think that webapplication-coding is by nature more suitable for a procedural style. You have a very clear starting point and end. So the timeline in your script is very linear. Compare this with java, where applets mostly run in a loop waiting for userevents. The fundamental difference in nature (begin->end against looping) explains my struggle to code completely  OOP with PHP.</p>
<p>Off course OOP has lots of advantages with PHP (execption handling, code reusability to name a few) but I think when coding webapplications, you will always find yourself coding a more or less procedural timeline within your script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/31/oop-programming-for-webapplications-usefull.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Babynamewizard.com</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/07/29/babynamewizardcom.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/07/29/babynamewizardcom.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babynames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an amazing java-applet. Especially because it is unbelievable fast. And it&#8217;s always fun to look up your own name&#8230;Apperently mine dropped from the top 100 during the 70&#8242;s. What surprised me was the popularity of my name during the 1930&#8242;s. Other fun names are: Bessie (name your daughter as a cow) and Xander [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an amazing java-applet.<br />
Especially because it is unbelievable fast. And it&#8217;s always fun to look up your own name&#8230;Apperently mine dropped from the top 100 during the 70&#8242;s.<br />
What surprised me was the popularity of my name during the 1930&#8242;s.</p>
<div align = "center">
<img src = "http://www.gargleblaster.org/images2/merlinnames.png" />
</div>
<p>Other fun names are: Bessie (name your daughter as a cow) and Xander (the Buffy effect).<br />
The url to the java-applet: <a href = "http://www.babynamewizard.com/namevoyager/" >http://www.babynamewizard.com/namevoyager/ </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/07/29/babynamewizardcom.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
