<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gargleblaster.org &#187; mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gargleblaster.org/tag/mathematics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Scientist Claims to Have Cracked Fermat&#8217;s Theorem</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/24/russian-scientist-claims-to-have-cracked-fermat%e2%80%99s-theorem.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/24/russian-scientist-claims-to-have-cracked-fermat%e2%80%99s-theorem.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fermat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fermat&#8217;s great theorem states that there are no positive integers x, y, and z such that xn + yn = zn in which n is a natural number greater than 2. A doctor of technical sciences from the Siberian city of Omsk has proved Fermat&#8217;s theorem and claims to have a &#8220;simple&#8221; proof. In 1995, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fermat&#8217;s great theorem states that there are no positive integers x, y, and z such that  <i>x</i><sup><i>n</i></sup> + <i>y</i><sup><i>n</i></sup> = <i>z</i><sup><i>n</i></sup> in which n is a natural number greater than 2.</p>
<p>A doctor of technical sciences from the Siberian city of Omsk has proved Fermat&#8217;s theorem and claims to have a &#8220;simple&#8221; proof.<br />
In 1995, the English mathematician Andrew Wiles published a proof of this theorem. However, Wiles his proof is beyond the understanding of most mathematicians today whereas Fermat claimed his theorem had a truly marvelous proof. So, math institutes still receive thousands of letters with proofs of Fermat&#8217;s theorem.</p>
<p>Well, I know I didn&#8217;t understand Wiles&#8217;s proof (not that I really tried). However the BBC horizon documentary was fun to watch.<br />
I&#8217;m looking forward to have this new proof explained to me. </p>
<p><a href="http://mosnews.com/news/2005/08/23/fermat.shtml">the story on mosnews.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_last_theorem">The wikipedia on Fermat. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/08/24/russian-scientist-claims-to-have-cracked-fermat%e2%80%99s-theorem.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Databases</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/05/03/databases.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/05/03/databases.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 09:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YES! I passed my databases exam! Course description (Dutch). I&#8217;m sooo happy. Now on with Discrete Math.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!</p>
<p>I passed my databases exam!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ou.nl/info-alg-informatica/databases/index.htm">Course description (Dutch)</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sooo happy.<br />
Now on with Discrete Math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/05/03/databases.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrete Math</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/04/17/discrete-math.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/04/17/discrete-math.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having probably made my last databases-exam, I started a new course, Discrete Math A. The last time I studied math was more than 9 years ago, and I found myself puzzling why (2n+1)2 was not (4n2 + 1). After 15 minutes of panic, I recalled my second grade math-classes: (2n+1)2 = 4n2 + 4n + [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having probably made my last databases-exam, I started a new course, Discrete Math A.<br />
The last time I studied math was more than 9 years ago, and I found myself puzzling why<br />
(2n+1)<sup>2 </sup>  was not (4n<sup>2 </sup> + 1).</p>
<p>After 15 minutes of panic, I recalled my second grade math-classes:<br />
(2n+1)<sup>2 </sup>= 4n<sup>2</sup> + 4n + 1<br />
because<br />
(2n+1)<sup>2</sup><br />
<br />
=(2n+1) * (2n+1)<br />
= 2n * 2n, 2n * 1, 1 * 2n, 1*1<br />
= 4n<sup>2</sup> + 2n + 2n + 1<br />
= 4n<sup>2</sup> + 4n + 1</p>
<p>pfeeuw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2005/04/17/discrete-math.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
