<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gargleblaster.org &#187; IPv4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gargleblaster.org/tag/ipv4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IPv4, IPv6&#8230; the end of tah internetz as we know it?</title>
		<link>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2009/09/08/ipv4-ipv6-the-end-of-tah-internetz-as-we-know-it.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2009/09/08/ipv4-ipv6-the-end-of-tah-internetz-as-we-know-it.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Merlijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gargleblaster.org/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 2001 (www.hal2001.org) I am very well aware that there is something called IPv6. And very well aware that the pool of IPv4 adresses is running out. When giving courses to new helpdesk personal at a large ISP in the Netherlands, I always warned them that IPv4 will have it&#8217;s limits&#8230;and we really need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2001 (<a href="http://www.hal2001.org">www.hal2001.org</a>) I am very well aware that there is something called IPv6. And very well aware that the pool of IPv4 adresses is running out. When giving courses to new helpdesk personal at a large ISP in the Netherlands, I always warned them that IPv4 will have it&#8217;s limits&#8230;and we really need to prepare ourselves for IPv6. Well&#8230; to be honest&#8230;even myself was thinking the last years: well&#8230;right&#8230;let&#8217;s see.</p>
<p>But more and more reports (stories) are popping up in the blogosphere and techsites. IPv4 is running out! yes! IPv6 does suck! (serious design flaws do exist) And the worst, a lot of firmware/embedded software, often not upgradable by users, doesn&#8217;t support IPv6.</p>
<p>Ars Technica however has recently <a href="http://arst.ch/778">published a nice article</a> about what the current state of IPv4 really is. And it doesn&#8217;t look good. Either we switch to IPv6&#8230;or switch to Carrier Grade NAT (CGN). The latter seems to be seriously sucky imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gargleblaster.org/2009/09/08/ipv4-ipv6-the-end-of-tah-internetz-as-we-know-it.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
